by Pola Oloixarac for Radar

At the time Lady Cavendish was the most versatile author of the English Baroque period. Fourteen years prior she had published her Atomic Poems, fantasies based on the theory of atoms and Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura, preceded by letters in defense of women poets (“If it is desirable for us to weave, why not write poetry, which is weaving with the mind?”). Three months later she published Philosophical Fancies, in which she proposed an alternative to the mechanical theory of nature; and in 1655, a book on physics and metaphysics, accompanied by a letter exhorting Cambridge and Oxford luminaries to read her.
Doubts were cast on the feminine provenance of her books; speculations were made that their true author must be her husband, Lord Cavendish. Anxious to be read and discussed by the eminences of her time, the Duchess conjectures that perhaps they are slow to assimilate her ideas; while she waits, she publishes a history of her own life, a few plays and a book of landscapes. As her dreamed-of interlocutors persist in ignoring her, she recurs to a matchless subterfuge: in 1663 she publishes the Philosophical Letters, in which she exchanges ideas with a fictitious woman, debating her own theories and critiquing Hobbes’ mechanicism as well as the philosophies of Van Helmont and Descartes.

At the time, only three women were recognized as intellectuals: Ana Maria von Schurman, author of a volume on the education of women; the Princess of Bohemia, who corresponded with Descartes; and Anne Conway, whose book was published anonymously and posthumously. Not so the Duchess, dubbed Mad Marge by her contemporaries. Though she had met Gassendi and Descartes, Lady Cavendish was not fluent in foreign languages and only corresponded, in English, with Glanvill and Huygens, minor deities. As philosophical patrons, the Cavendishes regularly hosted their protégés at the castle, where Hobbes was a habitué. The Duchess presided over these scholarly gatherings in silence, then would retire to her rooms to rant against what she heard. Her true life, she wrote, was treasured in her books; in her play The Convent of Pleasure (1668) she describes a community of free, happy women without men (with notes on a lesbian love affair); in The Blazing World, she explains that she has created “a kingdom for myself,” providing her with higher glories and acuter pleasures “than Alexander or Caesar ever felt upon conquering the terrestrial orb.” more mad marge
5 comments:
thank you for this, darling stef! it's a beautiful translation
The beauty lies in the original my dear Lady P., which is why I found it so inspiring. Lady C. herself would have been pleased. Imagine if she was our friend, qué delirio! Love fashion-obsessed chicks with scientific minds...
she IS totally our friend, i know it... i think we should play el juego de la copa one night let's see if she comes... we can dress up in wondrous 17th century style, and summmon her spirit. She'll totally come and hang with us
and then, party!!!!!!
In our time Lady C would probably win a Nobel prize, which she would receive clad in truly avant guard fashion of her own design à la a character out of Matthew Barney....
she would totally kick ass in balenciaga gladiators
Post a Comment